4.4 KiB
| title | date | module | problem_type | component | symptoms | root_cause | resolution_type | severity | tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVD compass vs components tab party ordering inconsistency | 2026-04-13 | analysis | ui_bug | analysis | [SVD components tab and political compass showed different party orderings for the same data Party positions in compass did not match positions in SVD Components tab for components 1-2] | logic_error | code_fix | medium | [svd pca compass alignment procrustes] |
SVD Compass vs Components Tab Party Ordering Inconsistency
Problem
The SVD Components tab and the political compass visualization showed different party orderings for the same data. Users would see a party at position X in the compass, but the same party at position Y in the SVD Components tab for components 1-2.
Symptoms
- Same party (e.g., PVV) has different x-coordinate in compass vs SVD Components tab
- Party ordering along political axis differs between the two views
- Confusing user experience when exploring voting patterns
What Didn't Work
Using raw SVD scores directly in the SVD Components tab. The compass uses Procrustes-aligned PCA positions from load_positions(), but components 1-2 in the SVD Components tab were using unaligned raw SVD scores. These are in different coordinate frames.
Solution
For components 1-2 in the SVD Components tab, use aligned PCA positions from load_positions() (same data source as compass) instead of raw SVD scores. Components 3-10 continue to use raw SVD scores.
Added _get_aligned_party_coords() helper function in explorer.py that:
- Calls
load_positions()to get aligned MP positions - Aggregates MP positions to party centroids using
load_party_map() - Returns
{party: (x, y)}coordinates
def _get_aligned_party_coords(window: str) -> Dict[str, Tuple[float, float]]:
"""Get party (x, y) coordinates from aligned PCA positions for a window."""
positions_by_window, _ = load_positions(db_path, "annual")
window_pos = positions_by_window.get(window, {})
if not window_pos:
return {}
# Load party map to convert MP names to parties
_party_map = load_party_map(db_path)
# Aggregate MP positions to party centroids
party_coords: Dict[str, List[Tuple[float, float]]] = {}
for mp_name, (x, y) in window_pos.items():
party = _party_map.get(
mp_name, _party_map.get(mp_name.split("(")[0].strip(), None)
)
if party:
party_coords.setdefault(party, []).append((x, y))
# Compute mean position per party
return {
party: (
float(np.mean([c[0] for c in coords])),
float(np.mean([c[1] for c in coords])),
)
for party, coords in party_coords.items()
if coords
}
The rendering code now branches based on component:
if comp_sel <= 2:
# Components 1-2: use aligned PCA positions (consistent with compass)
aligned_coords = _get_aligned_party_coords(svd_window)
for party, (x, y) in aligned_coords.items():
party_1d_coords[party] = (x,) if comp_sel == 1 else (y,)
else:
# Components 3-10: use raw SVD scores
idx = comp_sel - 1
for party, scores in party_scores.items():
if scores and len(scores) > idx:
party_1d_coords[party] = (float(scores[idx]),)
Why This Works
- Same coordinate frame: Both visualizations now use Procrustes-aligned PCA positions for components 1-2
- Consistent party centroids: Both aggregate MP positions to party centroids the same way
- Clear separation of concerns: Components 1-2 represent political compass axes (need alignment), while components 3-10 are topic dimensions (use raw SVD scores)
Prevention
- When adding new SVD/PCA visualizations, always check which data source the compass uses and use the same source for consistency
- Document coordinate frame requirements: "aligned" vs "raw" SVD scores have different interpretations
- Consider adding integration tests that verify compass and SVD Components tab show consistent positions
Related Files
explorer.py—_get_aligned_party_coords()helper, component 1-2 data loadinganalysis/political_axis.py—load_positions()and PCA alignment logicanalysis/explorer_data.py—load_party_scores_all_windows()for components 3-10
Related Issues
- This fix builds on the earlier SVD axis label alignment fix (
docs/solutions/ui-bugs/svd-axis-pole-labels-incorrect-after-flip.md)