Captures the 7-step methodology developed through multiple analysis
iterations: strict centrist definition, Procrustes-aligned SVD with
anchor-party sign validation, centrist support fraction over pass rate,
acceptance-without-conversion test, opposition-only filter as coalition
control, extremity-stratified tolerance analysis, and LLM score auditing.
- Reclassified centrist to {D66, CDA, CU, NSC} — removing VVD/BBB
which are center-right coalition partners
- Added centrist_support_strict (0.251→0.507, d=+0.65), center_right_support,
and left_support_mp columns via migration script
- Figure 1 now shows center-right (VVD/BBB) support as orange dashed line
- New Figure 3: bar chart of left-party support for right-wing motions
(0.268→0.202, left opposition hardened)
- New report Section 6 covering left-wing support trends
- All analysis now uses strict centrist definition throughout
Extremity Scorer (U4 enhanced):
- Now scores BOTH original motion text AND layman explanation separately
- Schema: text_score, text_explanation, layman_score, layman_explanation
- Text scores: 1→7, 2→33, 3→5, 4→5 (mild-to-moderate)
- Layman scores: 1→12, 2→20, 3→17, 4→1 (slightly milder)
Sentiment Analysis (U5 enhanced):
- Now scores BOTH original motion text AND layman explanation separately
- Schema: text_score, text_explanation, layman_score, layman_explanation
- Text sentiment avg: 0.294 (slightly positive)
- Layman sentiment avg: 0.416 (more positive - summaries tone down hostility)
Category Derivation (new):
- Two-phase LLM approach: derive taxonomy from sample, then apply to all
- Discovered 7 categories from 30-motion sample:
veiligheid/justitie, corona/pandemie, economie/belasting, klimaat/milieu,
defensie/buitenland, asiel/vreemdelingen, overig
- Applied to 50 motions with distribution shown in DB
- Adds category + category_explanation columns to right_wing_motions
Implements U5: sentiment_analysis.py uses LLM batch calls (fallback when no
local Dutch sentiment model is available) to score motion sentiment on [-1, 1]
scale.
Design:
- Prompt asks for sentiment from -1 (hostile/aggressive) to 1 (constructive)
- JSON schema enforces numeric score + Dutch explanation
- Batch size 10, max_workers 5 for parallel API calls
- Stores results in table
- Updates with avg_sentiment, sentiment_std,
pct_strongly_negative per year
Sample validation (50 motions): good variance across [-0.9, 1.0] range.
Implements U3: temporal_analysis.py computes yearly_summary from the
right_wing_motions table (U2 output).
Metrics per year:
- total_right_wing, pct_of_total, total_motions
- avg_right_support, avg_left_opposition, centrist_support
- avg_right_keyword_matches, extremity_index (U4 placeholder)
- yoy_right_wing_delta, yoy_pct_delta
Key finding: right-wing motions grew from ~4% (2018) to ~12% (2024-2025)
of all motions, with rising centrist support over time.
Removes embedding-heavy search and generic browser tabs from the Explorer.
The project does not currently use embeddings meaningfully, so the similarity
search and browser features were dead weight.
Changes:
- explorer.py: Remove search and browser tabs, keep compass/trajectories/SVD
- explorer.py: Remove fused_embeddings and similarity_cache stats from sidebar
- Home.py: Update Explorer description to match new focused layout
- analysis/tabs/__init__.py: Remove search and browser exports
- tests: Update decomposition and import tests for new tab set
Result: Explorer now has 3 focused analytical tabs instead of 5.
- compute_svd_for_window now computes explained variance ratio (s²/sum(s²))
and appends it as a metadata row (entity_type='metadata',
entity_id='explained_variance') to motion_rows
- load_scree_data reads this metadata row from svd_vectors instead of
querying the non-existent sv_metadata column
- run_svd_for_window counts only entity_type='motion' rows in stored_motion
so metadata rows don't inflate the count
- Added 5 TDD tests covering load, compute, store, and round-trip
All 227 tests pass.
- load_scree_data: return [] with TODO until schema stores EVR metadata
- load_party_axis_scores: compute from vectors instead of missing table
- load_party_axis_scores_for_window: same vector-based fallback
- load_party_scores_all_windows[_aligned]: check table existence,
fall back to computing from load_positions when absent
All functions predated decomposition (5afbad1, 2026-04-05) and relied on
party_axis_scores / sv_metadata columns that were never created.
- Add verify-lint-rule-scope-before-relying-on-it: guidance on
confirming lint rule coverage before trusting it for enforcement.
Documents the P2-002 incident where ruff BLE only catches bare
not .
- Update working-tree-hygiene: add dev-tool-in-venv check and
ruff dependency example.
- Add pytest-benchmark to dev dependencies
- Benchmark SVD decomposition on synthetic vote matrix
- Benchmark cosine similarity at small/medium/large scales
P5-003: Benchmark suite
- Wrap duckdb.connect() in try/except with specific duckdb.Error
- Replace bare with in _init_database
- Replace broad with for ALTER TABLE
- Add ruff BLE (blind except) lint rule to prevent regressions
- Add tests verifying graceful error handling for connect, insert, query
P2-002: Fix broad exception handling
- Add 2026-04-24 ROADMAP with 5 phases / 17 items
- Add detailed implementation plans for P1-001 through P4-005
- Add research artifacts and solution docs from ledger merge
- Add test for SVD component 1 compass alignment
- Enable T20 (flake8-print) for all Python files
- Exclude scripts/, tools/, and .mindmodel/examples/ where
stdout output is acceptable
Completes U6 of P2-001 (replace print with logging)
Replace all print() calls with logger.info/logger.error using
lazy % formatting. Add test verifying error path emits ERROR log.
U2 of P2-001 (replace print with logging)
- Create logging_config.py with configure_logging() helper
- Add tests for level setting, format, idempotency, and inheritance
U1 of P2-001 (replace print with logging)
- Fix mindmodel-schedule.yml to use uv and Python 3.13
- Add pytest.yml for push/PR test gate
- Remove broken scheduler service from docker-compose.yml
- Consolidate config.py into analysis/config.py with backward-compat shim
- Rewrite README.md with quickstart and project overview
- Update pre-commit-config.yaml to enable black, ruff, isort hooks
- Add pyright type-check job (continue-on-error until baseline fixed)
- Update AGENTS.md with Gitea infrastructure note
- Remove stale thoughts/ledgers/ and thoughts/shared/ artifacts
- Fix .gitignore duplicate .worktrees entry
- Move pyright to [dependency-groups] dev
- Replace hardcoded blog correlation with reproducible metric reference
- Add docs: verify-session-artifacts, fusion-vector-dimensions,
working-tree-hygiene
- Update blog-numbers-from-pipeline-outputs with correlation example
_get_aligned_party_scores and _get_aligned_trajectory_scores both called
compute_nd_axes() with no window_ids, which defaulted to _load_window_ids()
returning ALL windows including quarterly. This caused the SVD component 1
bar chart to disagree with the compass (which correctly used annual-only
windows via get_uniform_dim_windows). D66 appeared between GL-PvdA and PvdD
in component 1 because quarterly windows contaminated the PCA basis.
- analysis/explorer_data.py: add AND window_id NOT LIKE '%-Q%' to
_UNIFORM_DIM_SQL so quarterly windows are filtered at the source
- explorer.py: remove stale comment justifying quarterly inclusion;
remove redundant '-Q' guard in SVD tab trajectory view
- scripts/recompute_svd.py: replace quarter_bounds() with year_bounds()
that handles annual window IDs like '2024'; filter window list to
annual-only before recomputing SVD
Investigation of GroenLinks-PvdA merger dynamics in SVD space:
- Finding 1: GL-PvdA were 2.8-10.5% of avg inter-party distance apart pre-merger
- Finding 2: Merged party started most cohesive (#1 in 2023) but now 55% above avg spread
- Finding 3: Converged to 4.5% by Q3 2023, essentially indistinguishable
- Finding 4: GL/PvdA were most stable parties (10-25% drift) while VVD/D66 moved 70-177%
Revise SVD_THEMES labels based on TF-IDF analysis of top 50 motions
per component (pool size: current_parliament). Manual review of motion
titles ensures labels reflect actual parliamentary content rather than
party position semantics.
Key corrections:
- Axis 1: fiscal/economic policy vs social welfare + international rights
- Axis 4: active international engagement vs restraint
- Axis 5: pragmatic financial support vs progressive individual rights
- Axis 6: fossil fuels/financial incentives vs climate/intl rights
- Axis 7: practical-administrative vs idealistico-procedural (kept)
- Axis 8: European defense cooperation vs domestic socioeconomic policy
- Axis 9: concrete-administrative vs systemic reform
- Axis 10: citizen protection vs government regulation
Subagent analysis caught that axes 5 and 6 are NOT the same
(Nationale soevereiniteit) — manual motion review confirms distinct
content for each. Axes 1, 5, 6 had completely wrong labels.
Refs: thoughts/explorer/svd_label_review.md
See also: docs/brainstorms/2026-04-13-topic-derived-svd-labels-requirements.md
- Add _get_aligned_trajectory_scores() helper for multi-window aligned scores
- Update trajectory call to use compute_nd_axes instead of raw SVD scores
- Simplify _render_svd_time_trajectory by removing per-window flip computation
sgeboers